Do the high limit tables require a buy-in greater than the highest inside bet? The most I know is $1000 straight-up on any number (pays 35-to-1). Many big casinos on the Las Vegas strip offer this. Hi rollers make what is called a $1000 'complete bet' (wagering a total of $40,000) that pays $392,000 if the main number hits. The low and high numbers bet in Roulette otherwise known as 1 to 18: or 13 to 36 is another outside bet. In this type of bet you can wager your chips that the winning number will either be a high number or a low number. The numbers between 1 and 18 are considered to be low numbers, while the numbers between 19 and 36 are considered high numbers. What is the Highest Number found on a Standard Roulette Wheel? There are two kinds of Roulette. The first is the traditional Roulette or the European Roulette, and the other is the American Roulette. There is a set of numbers painted on the sides of the diamond-like projections, among which the highest number is 36. An Introduction to the Roulette Low and High Numbers Bet. The low and high numbers bet in Roulette otherwise known as 1 to 18: or 13 to 36 is another outside bet. In this type of bet you can wager your chips that the winning number will either be a high number or a low number.
- Highest Number In The World
- Highest Number Roulette Wheel
- Number Roulette Generator
- Roulette Highest Number Of Protons
- Roulette Highest Number Of Coronavirus Cases
onenickelmiracle
Just wondering, which casinos offer the highest bet on an inside number? Casinos around here might have a $2000 max bet listed, this only applies to the outside bets. If you want to bet a number, maxed out at $100. I dont know if it's still true, but Turning Stone used to be limit the inside bet to $25, while otherwise accepting a $5000 max bet outside. What's the highest bet inside allowed in Vegas? Do the high limit tables require a buy-in greater than the highest inside bet?In the land of the blind, the man with one eye is the care taker. Hold my beer.
teliotThanks for this post from:
Just wondering, which casinos offer the highest bet on an inside number? Casinos around here might have a $2000 max bet listed, this only applies to the outside bets. If you want to bet a number, maxed out at $100. I dont know if it's still true, but Turning Stone used to be limit the inside bet to $25, while otherwise accepting a $5000 max bet outside. What's the highest bet inside allowed in Vegas? Do the high limit tables require a buy-in greater than the highest inside bet?
The most I know is $1000 straight-up on any number (pays 35-to-1). Many big casinos on the Las Vegas strip offer this. Hi rollers make what is called a $1000 'complete bet' (wagering a total of $40,000) that pays $392,000 if the main number hits.Complete bets are described here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roulette
Often, at this level, players are given loss rebate incentives in excess of 10% and roulette is single-0.
Last edited by: teliot on Dec 10, 2016
onenickelmiracle
Thank you for answering. I can see why the bets seem low when I didn't even think of different bets combined being a reason I didn't know of. The limits are lower than I'd guess, but higher than being completely over protective.I'll occasionally bet $25-50 and the dealers act like my dog died when I lose. Then those blue moons I win, they're so amazed. They act like it's a big deal either way, giving more attention than it warrants. Tipping is kind of difficult when all your chips are the same, tending to just use one to tip rather than get change.
I could use Wizard's craps strategy instead of roulette, but I like the simplicity of one bet won or done for small stakes. There is more pride lost letting it ride then losing in craps, plus I might chicken out part way through.
In the land of the blind, the man with one eye is the care taker. Hold my beer.
DJTeddyBear
..Complete bets are described here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roulette
Actually, that's a link to the whole page.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roulette
Use this link instead:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roulette#Full_completes.2Fmaximums
to get to the section on Full / Complete and Maximums.
I invented a few casino games. Info: http://www.DaveMillerGaming.com/ ————————————————————————————————————— Superstitions are silly, childish, irrational rituals, born out of fear of the unknown. But how much does it cost to knock on wood? ?
onenickelmiracle
Quote: I think a long quote is allowed here on Wikipedia pages, if so, wikipedia
The maximum amount allowed to be wagered on a single bet in European roulette is based on a progressive betting model. If the casino allows a maximum bet of $1000 on a 35-to-1 straight-up, then on each 17-to-1 split connected to that straight-up, $2000 may be wagered. Spooky spins cheats. Each 8-to-1 corner that covers four numbers) may have $4000 wagered on it. Each 11-to-1 street that covers three numbers may have $3000 wagered on it. Each 5-to-1 six-line may have $6000 wagered on it. Each $1000 incremental bet would be represented by a marker that is used to specifically identify the player and the amount bet.
For instance, if a patron wished to place a full complete bet on 17, the player would call '17 to the maximum'. This bet would require a total of 40 chips or $40,000. To manually place the same wager, the player would need to bet:
17 to the maximum
Bet type
Number(s) bet on
Chips
Amount waged
Straight-up 17 1 $1,000
Split 14-17 2 $2,000
Split 16-17 2 $2,000
Split 17-18 2 $2,000
Split 17-20 2 $2,000
Street 16-17-18 3 $3,000
Corner 13-14-16-17 4 $4,000
Corner 14-15-17-18 4 $4,000
Corner 16-17-19-20 4 $4,000
Corner 17-18-20-21 4 $4,000
Six line 13-14-15-16-17-18 6 $6,000
Six line 16-17-18-19-20-21 6 $6,000
Total
40
$40,000
My understanding the same max applying to a single number also applied to corners and edges was wrong, so if the max on 17 was $100, $4000 could be bet around it(by a total maniac). Evenbob mentioned people in Vegas picking up losing bets and running out the door, but 40 chips would be too many. ?For instance, if a patron wished to place a full complete bet on 17, the player would call '17 to the maximum'. This bet would require a total of 40 chips or $40,000. To manually place the same wager, the player would need to bet:
17 to the maximum
Bet type
Number(s) bet on
Chips
Amount waged
Straight-up 17 1 $1,000
Split 14-17 2 $2,000
Split 16-17 2 $2,000
Split 17-18 2 $2,000
Split 17-20 2 $2,000
Street 16-17-18 3 $3,000
Corner 13-14-16-17 4 $4,000
Corner 14-15-17-18 4 $4,000
Corner 16-17-19-20 4 $4,000
Corner 17-18-20-21 4 $4,000
Six line 13-14-15-16-17-18 6 $6,000
Six line 16-17-18-19-20-21 6 $6,000
Total
40
$40,000
In the land of the blind, the man with one eye is the care taker. Hold my beer.
RS
I don't play roulette, but I've never heard of this incremental thing. If table max inside is $1k, then that's it, you can only bet up to $1k per way. Maybe it's different for different properties, I don't know.
KeyserThanks for this post from:
Roulette Maximums vary by casino.
Some casinos have a progressive max, and others have an anyway to the number max.
In many casinos you can negotiate higher limits.
For example at Caesars once they get to know you, and you put up a reasonable amount of front money, they will raise the max bet to 3k straight up.
MGM will often raise to 2k straight up.
Some casinos have a progressive max, and others have an anyway to the number max.
In many casinos you can negotiate higher limits.
For example at Caesars once they get to know you, and you put up a reasonable amount of front money, they will raise the max bet to 3k straight up.
MGM will often raise to 2k straight up.
Introduction
The Gambler's Fallacy is the mistaken belief that if an independent event has not happened in a long time, then it becomes overdue and more likely. It is also equally incorrect that if an outcome has happened a disproportionate number of times lately, compared to statistical expectations, then it becomes overheated and less likely to occur the next time. An example of this fallacious thinking might be that if the number 23 hasn't been drawn in a 6-49 lottery the last 100 games, then it becomes more likely to be drawn during the next drawing.
Many worthless betting strategies and systems are based on belief in the Gambler's Fallacy. I got the idea for writing about this after reading an 888 online roulette article by Frank Scoblete entitled How to Take Advantage of Roulette Hot Spots. In that article, Scoblete recommends taking a count of each outcome for 3,700 spins in single-zero roulette and 3,800 spins in double-zero roulette in the hunt for 'hot numbers.' Never mind that this would take about 100 hours to make this many observations, assuming the industry standard of 38 spins per hour.
Before going further, let me say that I strongly believe modern roulette wheels made by top brands like Cammegh are extremely precise and any bias would be minuscule compared to the house advantage. Thus, testing a modern roulette for bias would be a total waste of time. Now, testing a 30-year-old hand-me-down wheel in a banana republic might be another story. However, you're on your own if you win a lot of money from said casino and try to leave with it.
That said, if you track 3,800 outcomes in single-zero roulette, the average number of times any number will hit is 3800/38=100. I ran a simulation of over 1.3 trillion spins, counting how many times each number was hit, sorting the outcomes to find the most frequent number and how many times it was observed, and keeping a count of how many times the most frequent number in each simulation was seen.
Hottest Number in 3,800 Spins of Double-Zero Roulette
As a former actuary, I hate to use a layman's term like the 'hottest number,' but that is how gamblers talk so will go with that. That said, following are the results of the count of the hottest number in millions of 3800-spin simulations.
Count of the Hottest Number in 3,800 Spins on Double-Zero Wheel
Statistic | Value |
---|---|
Mean | 122.02 |
Median | 121 |
Mode | 120 |
90th Percentile | 128 |
95th Percentile | 131 |
99th Percentile | 136 |
99.9th Percentile | 142 |
Here is what the table above means in plain simple English.
- The mean, or average, count of the hottest number is 122.02.
- The median count of the most frequent number is 121. This means that over 50% of time the most frequent number appeared 121 times or less, as well as 121 times or more. This is possible because the probability of 121 observations is in both groups.
- The mode, or most count of the hottest number is 120, which happens 8.29% of the time.
- The 90th percentile is the smallest number such that the probability the count of the hottest number is at least 90% .
- The 95th percentile is the smallest number such that the probability the count of the hottest number is at least 95%.
- The 99th percentile is the smallest number such that the probability the count of the hottest number is at least 99%.
- The 99.9th percentile is the smallest number such that the probability the count of the hottest number is at least 99.9%.
Hottest Number in 3,700 Spins of Single-Zero Roulette
The results are very similar with 3,700 spins tracked on a single-zero wheel. Following is a summary of the results.
![Highest number ever Highest number ever](https://www.888casino.com/blog/sites/newblog.888casino.com/files/styles/article_list_255x143_/public/2018-01/roulette-prediction-numbers.jpg?itok=1MhDyuve)
Count of the Hottest Number in 3,700 Spins on Single-Zero Wheel
Statistic | Value |
---|---|
Mean | 121.90 |
Median | 121 |
Mode | 120 |
90th Percentile | 128 |
95th Percentile | 131 |
99th Percentile | 136 |
99.9th Percentile | 142 |
The following table shows the full results of the simulation on both wheels. The two commulative columns show the probability that the count of the hottest number is the number on the left column or more. For example, the probability the hottest number in 3,700 spins of single-zero roulette is 130 or more is 0.072044.
Summary of the Count of the Hottest Number in 3,700 Spins of Single-Zero Roulette and 3,800 spins of Double-Zero Roulette
Count | Probability Single Zero | Cummulative Single Zero | Probability Double Zero | Cummulative Double Zero |
---|---|---|---|---|
160 or More | 0.000001 | 0.000001 | 0.000001 | 0.000001 |
159 | 0.000000 | 0.000001 | 0.000000 | 0.000001 |
158 | 0.000001 | 0.000001 | 0.000001 | 0.000001 |
157 | 0.000001 | 0.000002 | 0.000001 | 0.000002 |
156 | 0.000001 | 0.000003 | 0.000001 | 0.000003 |
155 | 0.000002 | 0.000005 | 0.000002 | 0.000005 |
154 | 0.000003 | 0.000009 | 0.000003 | 0.000008 |
153 | 0.000005 | 0.000013 | 0.000005 | 0.000013 |
152 | 0.000007 | 0.000020 | 0.000008 | 0.000021 |
151 | 0.000012 | 0.000032 | 0.000012 | 0.000033 |
150 | 0.000017 | 0.000049 | 0.000018 | 0.000051 |
149 | 0.000026 | 0.000075 | 0.000027 | 0.000077 |
148 | 0.000038 | 0.000114 | 0.000041 | 0.000118 |
147 | 0.000060 | 0.000174 | 0.000062 | 0.000180 |
146 | 0.000091 | 0.000265 | 0.000092 | 0.000273 |
145 | 0.000132 | 0.000397 | 0.000137 | 0.000409 |
144 | 0.000195 | 0.000592 | 0.000199 | 0.000608 |
143 | 0.000282 | 0.000874 | 0.000289 | 0.000898 |
142 | 0.000409 | 0.001283 | 0.000421 | 0.001319 |
141 | 0.000580 | 0.001863 | 0.000606 | 0.001925 |
140 | 0.000833 | 0.002696 | 0.000860 | 0.002784 |
139 | 0.001186 | 0.003882 | 0.001215 | 0.003999 |
138 | 0.001652 | 0.005534 | 0.001704 | 0.005703 |
137 | 0.002315 | 0.007849 | 0.002374 | 0.008077 |
136 | 0.003175 | 0.011023 | 0.003286 | 0.011363 |
135 | 0.004355 | 0.015378 | 0.004489 | 0.015852 |
134 | 0.005916 | 0.021295 | 0.006088 | 0.021940 |
133 | 0.007939 | 0.029233 | 0.008196 | 0.030136 |
132 | 0.010601 | 0.039834 | 0.010908 | 0.041044 |
131 | 0.013991 | 0.053824 | 0.014384 | 0.055428 |
130 | 0.018220 | 0.072044 | 0.018757 | 0.074185 |
129 | 0.023498 | 0.095542 | 0.024114 | 0.098299 |
128 | 0.029866 | 0.125408 | 0.030603 | 0.128901 |
127 | 0.037288 | 0.162696 | 0.038228 | 0.167130 |
126 | 0.045771 | 0.208467 | 0.046898 | 0.214027 |
125 | 0.055165 | 0.263632 | 0.056310 | 0.270337 |
124 | 0.064853 | 0.328485 | 0.066020 | 0.336357 |
123 | 0.074178 | 0.402662 | 0.075236 | 0.411593 |
122 | 0.081929 | 0.484591 | 0.082885 | 0.494479 |
121 | 0.087158 | 0.571750 | 0.087696 | 0.582174 |
120 | 0.088520 | 0.660269 | 0.088559 | 0.670734 |
119 | 0.084982 | 0.745252 | 0.084406 | 0.755140 |
118 | 0.076454 | 0.821705 | 0.075245 | 0.830385 |
117 | 0.063606 | 0.885312 | 0.061851 | 0.892236 |
116 | 0.048069 | 0.933381 | 0.046111 | 0.938347 |
115 | 0.032432 | 0.965813 | 0.030604 | 0.968952 |
114 | 0.019117 | 0.984930 | 0.017664 | 0.986616 |
113 | 0.009567 | 0.994496 | 0.008614 | 0.995230 |
112 | 0.003894 | 0.998390 | 0.003420 | 0.998650 |
111 | 0.001257 | 0.999647 | 0.001065 | 0.999715 |
110 | 0.000297 | 0.999944 | 0.000243 | 0.999958 |
109 | 0.000050 | 0.999994 | 0.000038 | 0.999996 |
108 or Less | 0.000006 | 1.000000 | 0.000004 | 1.000000 |
Count of the Hottest Numbers in 300 Spins in Double-Zero Roulette
What if you don't want to spend 100 hours gathering data on a single wheel? Some casinos are kind enough to give you, on a silver platter, the number of times in the last 300 spins the four 'hottest' and 'coolest' numbers occurred. The image at the top of the page shows an example taken on a double-zero wheel at the Venetian.
In 300 spins, the average number of wins on a double-zero wheel for any number is 300/38=7.9. As you can see from the image above, the four hottest numbers were 20, 5, 29, and 2, which occurred 15, 14, 13, and 12 times respectively. Is this unusual? No. In a simulation of over 80 billion spins, the most frequent number, in 300-spin experiments, appeared most frequently at 14 times with a probability of 27.4%. The most likely total of the second, third, and fourth most frequent numbers was 13, 12, and 12 times respectively, with probabilities of 37.9%, 46.5%, and 45.8%. So the results of the 'hottest' numbers in the image above were a little more flat than average.
The following table shows the probabilities of the four hottest numbers in 300 spins of double-zero roulette. For example, the probability the third most frequent number happens 15 times is 0.009210.
Count of the Hottest Four Numbers in 300 Spins on a Double-Zero Wheel
Observations | Probability Most Frequent | Probability Second Most Frequent | Probability Third Most Frequent | Probability Fourth Most Frequent |
---|---|---|---|---|
25 or More | 0.000022 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
24 | 0.000051 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
23 | 0.000166 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
22 | 0.000509 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
21 | 0.001494 | 0.000001 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
20 | 0.004120 | 0.000009 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
19 | 0.010806 | 0.000075 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
18 | 0.026599 | 0.000532 | 0.000003 | 0.000000 |
17 | 0.060526 | 0.003263 | 0.000060 | 0.000001 |
16 | 0.123564 | 0.016988 | 0.000852 | 0.000020 |
15 | 0.212699 | 0.071262 | 0.009210 | 0.000598 |
14 | 0.274118 | 0.215025 | 0.068242 | 0.011476 |
13 | 0.212781 | 0.379097 | 0.283768 | 0.117786 |
12 | 0.067913 | 0.270747 | 0.464748 | 0.457655 |
11 | 0.004615 | 0.042552 | 0.168285 | 0.383900 |
10 | 0.000017 | 0.000448 | 0.004830 | 0.028544 |
9 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000001 | 0.000020 |
Total | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 |
Highest Number In The World
The next table shows the mean, median, and mode for the count of the first, second, third, and fourth hottest numbers in millions of 300-spin simulations of double-zero roulette.
Summary of the Count of the Four Most Frequent Numbers in 300 Spins of Double-Zero Wheel
Order | Mean | Median | Mode |
---|---|---|---|
First | 14.48 | 14 | 14 |
Second | 13.07 | 13 | 13 |
Third | 12.27 | 12 | 12 |
Fourth | 11.70 | 12 | 12 |
Count of the Coolest Numbers in 300 Spins in Double-Zero Roulette
The next table shows the probability of each count of the four collest numbers in 300 spins of double-zero roulette. Caesars rewards phone number.
Count of the Coolest Four Numbers in 300 Spins on a Double-Zero Wheel
Observations | Probability Least Frequent | Probability Second Least Frequent | Probability Third Least Frequent | Probability Fourth Least Frequent |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.012679 | 0.000063 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
1 | 0.098030 | 0.005175 | 0.000135 | 0.000002 |
2 | 0.315884 | 0.088509 | 0.012041 | 0.001006 |
3 | 0.416254 | 0.420491 | 0.205303 | 0.063065 |
4 | 0.150220 | 0.432638 | 0.595139 | 0.522489 |
5 | 0.006924 | 0.052945 | 0.185505 | 0.401903 |
6 | 0.000008 | 0.000180 | 0.001878 | 0.011534 |
Total | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 |
The next table shows the mean, median, and mode for the count of the first, second, third, and fourth coolest numbers in the 300-spin simulations of double-zero roulette.
![Roulette table highest number Roulette table highest number](https://www.mysticalwheel.co.uk/data/uploads/roulette-wheel-numbers.png)
Summary of the count of the Four Least Frequent Numbers on a Double-Zero Wheel
Highest Number Roulette Wheel
Order | Mean | Median | Mode |
---|---|---|---|
Least | 2.61 | 3 | 3 |
Second Least | 3.44 | 3 | 4 |
Third Least | 3.96 | 4 | 4 |
Fourth Least | 4.36 | 4 | 4 |
Count of the Hottest Numbers in 300 Spins of Single-Zero Roulette
In 300 spins, the average number of wins on a single-zero wheel for any number is 300/37=8.11. The next table shows the probability of each count of the four coolest numbers in 300 spins of double-zero roulette. For example, the probability the third most frequent number happens 15 times is 0.015727.
Count of the Hottest Four Numbers in 300 Spins on a Single-Zero Wheel
Observations | Probability Most Frequent | Probability Second Most Frequent | Probability Third Most Frequent | Probability Fourth Most Frequent |
---|---|---|---|---|
25 or More | 0.000034 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
24 | 0.000078 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
23 | 0.000245 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
22 | 0.000728 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
21 | 0.002069 | 0.000002 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
20 | 0.005570 | 0.000018 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
19 | 0.014191 | 0.000135 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
18 | 0.033833 | 0.000905 | 0.000008 | 0.000000 |
17 | 0.074235 | 0.005202 | 0.000125 | 0.000001 |
16 | 0.144490 | 0.025286 | 0.001624 | 0.000050 |
15 | 0.232429 | 0.097046 | 0.015727 | 0.001286 |
14 | 0.269735 | 0.259360 | 0.101259 | 0.021054 |
13 | 0.177216 | 0.382432 | 0.347102 | 0.175177 |
12 | 0.043266 | 0.208137 | 0.429715 | 0.508292 |
11 | 0.001879 | 0.021373 | 0.102979 | 0.283088 |
10 | 0.000003 | 0.000103 | 0.001461 | 0.011049 |
9 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000002 |
Total | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 |
The next table shows the mean, median, and mode for the count of the first, second, third, and fourth hottest numbers in millions of 300-spin simulations of double-zero roulette.
Summary — Count of the Four Hottest Numbers — Double-Zero Wheel
Order | Mean | Median | Mode |
---|---|---|---|
First | 14.74 | 15 | 14 |
Second | 13.30 | 13 | 13 |
Third | 12.50 | 12 | 12 |
Fourth | 11.92 | 12 | 12 |
Count of the Coolest Numbers in 300 Spins in Single-Zero Roulette
The next table shows the probability of each count of the four coolest numbers in 300 spins of double-zero roulette. For example, the probability the third coolest numbers will be observed five times is 0.287435.
Count of the Coolest Four Numbers in 300 Spins on a Double-Zero Wheel
Observations | Probability Least Frequent | Probability Second Least Frequent | Probability Third Least Frequent | Probability Fourth Least Frequent |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.009926 | 0.000038 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
1 | 0.079654 | 0.003324 | 0.000068 | 0.000001 |
2 | 0.275226 | 0.062392 | 0.006791 | 0.000448 |
3 | 0.419384 | 0.350408 | 0.140173 | 0.034850 |
4 | 0.200196 | 0.484357 | 0.557907 | 0.406702 |
5 | 0.015563 | 0.098547 | 0.287435 | 0.521238 |
6 | 0.000050 | 0.000933 | 0.007626 | 0.036748 |
7 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000001 | 0.000013 |
Total | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 |
The next table shows the mean, median, and mode for the count of the first, second, third, and fourth coolest numbers in the 300-spin simulations of single-zero roulette.
Summary of the count of the Four Least Frequent Numbers on a Single-Zero Wheel
Order | Mean | Median | Mode |
---|---|---|---|
Least | 2.77 | 3 | 3 |
Second Least | 3.62 | 4 | 4 |
Third Least | 4.15 | 4 | 4 |
Fourth Least | 4.56 | 5 | 5 |
The least I hope you have learned from this article is it is to be expected that certain numbers will come up more than others. To put it in other words, it is natural that some numbers will be 'hot' and some 'cool.' In fact, such differences from the mean are highly predictable. Unfortunately, for roulette players, we don't know which numbers will be 'hot,' just that some of them almost certainly will be. I would also like to emphasize, contrary to the Gambler's Fallacy, that on a fair roulette wheel that every number is equally likely every spin and it makes no difference what has happened in the past.
Number Roulette Generator
Finally, it should not be interpreted that we give an endorsement to the 888 Casino, which we linked to earlier. I am very bothered by this rule in their rule 6.2.B. Before getting to that, let me preface with a quote from rule 6.1, which I'm fine with.
'If we reasonably determine that you are engaging in or have engaged in fraudulent or unlawful activity or conducted any prohibited transaction (including money laundering) under the laws of any jurisdiction that applies to you (examples of which are set out at section 6.2 below), any such act will be considered as a material breach of this User Agreement by you. In such case we may close your account and terminate the User Agreement in accordance with section 14 below and we are under no obligation to refund to you any deposits, winnings or funds in your account.' -- Rule 6.1
Let's go further now:
The following are some examples of 'fraudulent or unlawful activity' -- Rule 6.2
Next, here is one of many examples listed as rule 6.2.B
'Unfair Betting Techniques: Utilising any recognised betting techniques to circumvent the standard house edge in our games, which includes but is not limited to martingale betting strategies, card counting as well as low risk betting in roulette such as betting on red/black in equal amounts.' -- Rule 6.2.B Foxwoods online casino promo codes 2019.
Roulette Highest Number Of Protons
Let me make it perfectly clear that all betting systems, including the Martingale, not only can't circumvent the house edge, they can't even dent it. It is very mathematically ignorant on the part of the casino to fear any betting system. Why would any player trust this casino when the casino can seize all their money under the reason that the player was using a betting system? Any form of betting could be called a betting system, including flat betting. Casino 888 normally has a pretty good reputation, so I'm surprised they would lower themselves to this kind of rogue rule.
Roulette Highest Number Of Coronavirus Cases
Written by: Michael Shackleford